<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RM64.blog &#187; Harker Research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rm64.com/tag/harker-research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rm64.com</link>
	<description>A blog regarding RM64.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 22:14:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Radio Missing Out on Billions Due to Arbitron Estimates?</title>
		<link>http://rm64.com/2010/07/28/radio-missing-out-on-billions-due-to-arbitron-estimates/</link>
		<comments>http://rm64.com/2010/07/28/radio-missing-out-on-billions-due-to-arbitron-estimates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arbitron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harker Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio Insights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rm64.com/?p=3787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Check out an interesting piece on Harker Research&#8217;s Radio InSights blog this week that compares radio measurement numbers in top markets from Arbitron PPM against a recent summary of similar markets by Nielson. Read the full-piece to get the scope of the proposed discrepancy, but essentially by using the Arbitron PPM system, which admittedly creates lower estimates, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-3788 alignright" title="radio-tower" src="http://rm64.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/radio-tower.jpg" alt="" width="119" height="124" /></p>
<p>Check out an interesting piece on <strong>Harker Research</strong>&#8217;s <strong><a href="http://harkerresearch.typepad.com/radioinsights/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">Radio InSights</span></a></strong> blog this week that compares radio measurement numbers in top markets from <strong>Arbitron</strong> PPM against a recent summary of similar markets by <strong>Nielson</strong>. Read the <a href="http://harkerresearch.typepad.com/radioinsights/2010/07/did-radio-leave-7-billion-on-the-table.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">full-piece</span></a> to get the scope of the proposed discrepancy, but essentially by using the Arbitron PPM system, which admittedly creates lower estimates, radio could be potentially missing out on billions from media buyers who are cautious of the <em>70 = 100</em> formula that Arbitron has been pitching&#8230;</p>
<div style='display:none' id="post-refEl-3787"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rm64.com/2010/07/28/radio-missing-out-on-billions-due-to-arbitron-estimates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

