<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RM64.blog &#187; EMI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rm64.com/tag/emi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rm64.com</link>
	<description>A blog regarding RM64.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 03:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>More from Dive Into Media: Vevo, Spotify &amp; Neil Young</title>
		<link>http://rm64.com/2012/02/01/more-from-dive-into-media-vevo-spotify-neil-young/</link>
		<comments>http://rm64.com/2012/02/01/more-from-dive-into-media-vevo-spotify-neil-young/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neil Young]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spotify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vevo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warner Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rm64.com/?p=7633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
Vevo CEO Rio Caraeff, made the first public statements regarding the video site&#8217;s profitability at the digital media conference this week, putting it plainly, “We are making money, yes,” with a reported $150 million in revenue last year. In terms of the future, Caraeff predicted that the joint-venture, which includes Sony Music, Universal Music [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong> </strong></p>
<div id="attachment_7634" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 226px"><strong><img class="size-full wp-image-7634  " title="Neil-Young" src="http://rm64.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Neil-Young.jpg" alt="" width="216" height="122" /></strong><p class="wp-caption-text">Neil Young addresses labels, piracy &amp; more</p></div>
<p><strong>Vevo</strong> CEO <strong>Rio Caraeff</strong>, made the first <span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/01/idUS262789440520120201" target="_blank">public statements</a> </span>regarding the video site&#8217;s profitability at the digital media conference this week, putting it plainly, “We are making money, yes,” with a reported $150 million in revenue last year. In terms of the future, Caraeff predicted that the joint-venture, which includes <strong>Sony Music</strong>, <strong>Universal Music</strong> and <strong>EMI</strong>, could be a billion dollar business in a &#8220;short period of time&#8221;&#8230; Meanwhile, <strong>Edgar Bronfman Jr.</strong> lauded <strong>Spotify</strong> as being artist-friendly and not detrimental to download sales, during his <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2012/01/31/bronfman-on-google-music/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">interview</span></a>, and called <strong>Google Music</strong> an oxymoron, explaining that there&#8217;s no &#8220;beef&#8221; between <strong>Warner Music</strong> and Google, but they need to decide if they want to be a content platform&#8230; And <strong>Neil Young </strong><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2012/01/31/neil-young-defends-both-record-companies-and-piracy/?mod=WSJBlog" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">addressed</span></a> a number of topics including audio quality, record labels, piracy and how he and the late <strong>Steve Jobs</strong> has discussed how to reconcile the current issues facing the digital music era by combining all three.</p>
<div style='display:none' id="post-refEl-7633"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rm64.com/2012/02/01/more-from-dive-into-media-vevo-spotify-neil-young/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outgoing Warner Music Chairman maligns Universal acquiring EMI</title>
		<link>http://rm64.com/2012/02/01/outgoing-warner-music-chairman-maligns-universal-acquiring-emi/</link>
		<comments>http://rm64.com/2012/02/01/outgoing-warner-music-chairman-maligns-universal-acquiring-emi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edgar Bronfman Jr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Music Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warner Music Group]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rm64.com/?p=7628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Speaking at the Dive Into Media conference yesterday in California, on what was his last day as Chairman of Warner Music Group, Edgar Bronfman Jr. didn&#8217;t mince any words when it came to the topic of Universal Music Group&#8217;s planned acquisition of the EMI recorded music division. &#8220;It does strike me as hubris particularly for Universal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_7630" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-7630" title="dmedia-bronfman" src="http://rm64.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/dmedia-bronfman-500x333.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Edgar Bronfman Jr. speaks with AllThingsD&#39;s Peter Kafka</p></div>
<p>Speaking at the <strong>Dive Into Media</strong> conference yesterday in California, on what was his last day as Chairman of <strong>Warner Music Group</strong>, <strong>Edgar Bronfman Jr.</strong> didn&#8217;t mince any words when it came to the topic of <strong>Universal Music Group</strong>&#8217;s planned acquisition of the <strong>EMI</strong> recorded music division. &#8220;It does strike me as hubris particularly for Universal to think it&#8217;s going to be easy to buy EMI, and frankly to think they can buy EMI at all,&#8221; said Bronfman, also saying that the merger would create a &#8220;super-major&#8221; that would not only control the future of recorded music, but &#8220;the future of all digital media.&#8221; He also confirmed that Warner Music would indeed be fighting the deal, as was expected with the recent news of WMG&#8217;s hiring of an anti-trust lobbyist firm. Bronfman also denied that the failure to successfully acquire EMI was the impetus for his departure as chairman, and that his biggest regret looking back was his misjudgment in the mobile space, saying that the platform &#8220;took longer to mature than I thought at the time.”</p>
<div style='display:none' id="post-refEl-7628"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rm64.com/2012/02/01/outgoing-warner-music-chairman-maligns-universal-acquiring-emi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EMI Sale: Warner Music hires antitrust lobbying firm, UK indies take AIM at deal</title>
		<link>http://rm64.com/2012/01/19/emi-sale-warner-music-hires-antitrust-lobbying-firm-uk-indies-take-aim-at-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://rm64.com/2012/01/19/emi-sale-warner-music-hires-antitrust-lobbying-firm-uk-indies-take-aim-at-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warner Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rm64.com/?p=7584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The LegalTimes blog reported on Tuesday that Warner Music Group has hired the lobbyist team of Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, who filed registration report paperwork with Congress last week indicating it would be lobbying on antitrust matters &#8211; presumably in an effort to block the completion of Citigroup&#8217;s sale of EMI. The Brownstein team lobbied [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-7585" title="Association_of_Independent_Music" src="http://rm64.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Association_of_Independent_Music.jpg" alt="" width="185" height="123" />The <strong>LegalTimes</strong> <a href="http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2012/01/brownstein-hired-to-lobby-for-music-label-on-antitrust-issues.html" target="_blank">blog</a> reported on Tuesday that <strong>Warner Music Group </strong>has hired the lobbyist team of <strong>Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck</strong>, who filed registration report paperwork with Congress last week indicating it would be lobbying on antitrust matters &#8211; presumably in an effort to block the completion of <strong>Citigroup</strong>&#8217;s sale of <strong>EMI</strong>. The Brownstein team lobbied against the acquisition of <strong>T-Mobile</strong> by <strong>AT&amp;T</strong> last year, a merger bid which was ultimately dropped in December&#8230; Meanwhile, <strong>AIM</strong> the UK independent trade organization has <a href="http://www.musicweek.com/story.asp?sectioncode=1&amp;storycode=1048177&amp;c=1" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">launched</span></a> an offensive to urge the government to review the break-up of EMI to the winning bidders in <strong>Universal Music</strong> and <strong>Sony Music</strong> (via Sony&#8217;s interest in the group which bid on <strong>EMI Music Publishing</strong>). The campaign includes reference to the extraordinary recent success of independent-label act <strong>Adele</strong>, given the current state of the industry, and that the increased size of Universal and Sony would make such a phenomenon even more difficult to achieve. It is also said to include quotes from <strong>Beggars Group </strong>chief <strong>Martin Mills</strong> calling the deal &#8220;breathtaking arrogance&#8221; and &#8220;bad news for almost everyone involved in the art and business of music&#8221;.</p>
<div style='display:none' id="post-refEl-7584"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rm64.com/2012/01/19/emi-sale-warner-music-hires-antitrust-lobbying-firm-uk-indies-take-aim-at-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube &amp; record labels engaged in renewal talks</title>
		<link>http://rm64.com/2012/01/13/youtube-record-labels-engaged-in-renewal-talks/</link>
		<comments>http://rm64.com/2012/01/13/youtube-record-labels-engaged-in-renewal-talks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warner Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rm64.com/?p=7560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to an article by Greg Sandoval on CNET this morning, Universal Music, Sony Music and EMI are all in the process of negotiating renewed licenses with YouTube, while Warner Music, whose relationship with the Google-owned video site has been particularly tenuous in previous years, is noticeably not mentioned.  According to the piece, deals are close [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7561 alignleft" title="youtube-logo" src="http://rm64.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/youtube-logo-150x106.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="106" />According to an article by <strong>Greg Sandoval</strong> on <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-31001_3-57358695-261/frictionless-commerce-youtube-music-labels-close-to-renewing-licenses/?tag=txt;title" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>CNET</strong></span></a> this morning, <strong>Universal Music</strong>, <strong>Sony Music </strong>and <strong>EMI</strong> are all in the process of negotiating renewed licenses with <strong>YouTube</strong>, while <strong>Warner Music</strong>, whose relationship with the <strong>Google</strong>-owned video site has been particularly tenuous in previous years, is noticeably not mentioned.  According to the piece, deals are close at hand, with the labels focused on increased anti-piracy measures by the site, as well of course, as larger licensing fees. It appears at least one of the three label groups may have already reached a new agreement with Youtube.</p>
<div style='display:none' id="post-refEl-7560"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rm64.com/2012/01/13/youtube-record-labels-engaged-in-renewal-talks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aaronson goes to Whalley World</title>
		<link>http://rm64.com/2012/01/13/aaronson-goes-to-whalley-world/</link>
		<comments>http://rm64.com/2012/01/13/aaronson-goes-to-whalley-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitol Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sire Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warner Bros. Records]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rm64.com/?p=7556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears former President of Sire Records and longtime Warner Bros. Records A&#38;R executive Craig Aaronson has joined his previous boss Tom Whalley at his new A&#38;R-focused operation, which currently exists in uncertain terms under the Universal Music umbrella. Rumors have Whalley getting his own imprint label under Universal Republic, while reports last month have the former [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-7557" title="SORRY_FOLKS" src="http://rm64.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/SORRY_FOLKS-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" />It appears former President of <strong>Sire Records</strong> and longtime <strong>Warner Bros. Records </strong>A&amp;R executive <strong>Craig Aaronson</strong> has joined his previous boss <strong>Tom Whalley</strong> at his new A&amp;R-focused operation, which currently exists in uncertain terms under the <strong>Universal Music </strong>umbrella. Rumors have Whalley getting his own imprint label under <strong>Universal Republic</strong>, while <a href="https://secure.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/backbeat/backbeat-is-tom-whalley-the-next-head-of-1005685762.story" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">reports</span></a> last month have the former WBR chief as the new commander-in-waiting for a revived <strong>Capitol Records</strong> under UMG, though the regulatory process for Universal&#8217;s acquisition of <strong>EMI</strong> is far from being done&#8230; Stay tuned.</p>
<div style='display:none' id="post-refEl-7556"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rm64.com/2012/01/13/aaronson-goes-to-whalley-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EMI Round Up: More lawsuits, lost bonuses &amp; licensing merger</title>
		<link>http://rm64.com/2012/01/10/emi-round-up-more-lawsuits-lost-bonuses-licensing-merger/</link>
		<comments>http://rm64.com/2012/01/10/emi-round-up-more-lawsuits-lost-bonuses-licensing-merger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Faxon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rm64.com/?p=7524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week saw EMI join the legal fray against digital music service Grooveshark, joining Sony, Universal and Warner Music, as well as taking copyright infringement action against ReDigi, a new company that is modeled on the selling of &#8220;used&#8221; MP3 files&#8230; Meanwhile it was reported last week that senior managers within EMI, including Roger Faxon, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-7525" title="emi_3" src="http://rm64.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/emi_3-500x276.jpg" alt="" width="252" height="139" />Last week saw <strong>EMI</strong> join the legal fray against digital music service <strong>Grooveshark</strong>, joining <strong>Sony</strong>, <strong>Universal</strong> and <strong>Warner Music</strong>, as well as taking copyright infringement action against <strong>ReDigi</strong>, a new company that is modeled on the selling of &#8220;used&#8221; MP3 files&#8230; Meanwhile it was reported last week that senior managers within EMI, including <strong>Roger Faxon</strong>, will not be receiving millions of dollars in bonuses from a payment structure previously set up by <strong>Guy Hands</strong>, due to <strong>Citigroup</strong>&#8217;s sale of the company not exceeding &#8220;the relevant amount&#8221;&#8230; And in the latest effort to bolster the global rights management initiative instituted under Faxon, the sync and licensing operations from EMI&#8217;s recording and publishing divisions will be combined&#8230; [<em>Update</em>] <a href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/d4e7093c-3ba3-11e1-a09a-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1jApDndMK" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>FT.com</strong></span></a> is reporting that a UK court has thrown out Guy Hands plea for the release of documents from Citigroup&#8217;s advisors relating to the valuation of EMI at the time of the bank&#8217;s takeover of the company last year and the subsequent sale.</p>
<div style='display:none' id="post-refEl-7524"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rm64.com/2012/01/10/emi-round-up-more-lawsuits-lost-bonuses-licensing-merger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Round Up: Google Music launches</title>
		<link>http://rm64.com/2011/11/17/digital-round-up-google-music-launches/</link>
		<comments>http://rm64.com/2011/11/17/digital-round-up-google-music-launches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 22:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rm64.com/?p=7378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Just about one year after Google had originally planned to unveil Google Music, a service that spent much of the last two years changing in concept and approach, and of course engaging in numerous negotiations with record labels, the (almost) fully-fledged music service was revealed yesterday. Three of the four (soon to be two of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-7384" title="google-music-store" src="http://rm64.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/google-music-store-499x396.png" alt="" width="499" height="396" /></p>
<p>Just about one year after <strong>Google</strong> had originally planned to unveil <strong>Google Music</strong>, a service that spent much of the last two years changing in concept and approach, and of course engaging in numerous negotiations with record labels, the (almost) fully-fledged music service was revealed yesterday. Three of the four (soon to be two of the three) major labels are onboard, with music available from <strong>Universal</strong>, <strong>Sony</strong> and <strong>EMI</strong>, while <strong>Warner Music</strong> is expected to be joining sometime soon. So how does it work? Basically it&#8217;s similar to how Google Music <em>Beta</em> worked, with a locker where users can upload up to 20,000 songs for free, regardless of where they originated, but now Google has its own digital music store tied to the <strong>Android</strong> market as well, where users can purchase music that automatically goes to their lockers. There&#8217;s also a tie-up with <strong>T-Mobile</strong> that allows customers of the carrier to download music and have it included with their monthly billing. And that &#8220;twist,&#8221; which was teased recently, is indeed a sharing feature. Users can share songs or albums with anyone on <strong>Google+</strong>, who can then listen to the song or album once in its entirety for free. Additionally there is an <em>Artist Hub</em> feature, a much more interesting twist for independent artists, who can create their own page within the Google Music marketplace, and sell directly to customers without a middleman and collect their 70% cut of each sale&#8230; Much of the discussion following the release of the new service has been approached in the Google Music vs. <strong>iTunes</strong> manner &#8211; <strong>Apple</strong> finally launched <em>iTunes Match</em> last week with less fanfare &#8211; but as some observers are astutely pointing out, it isn&#8217;t about an <span style="color: #0000ff;"><em><a href="http://allthingsd.com/20111116/google-music-isnt-an-itunes-killer-and-its-not-supposed-to-be/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">iTunes-killer</span></a> </em><span style="color: #000000;">for Google</span></span>, at least not right now. There are differences &#8211; Apple has the &#8217;scan and match&#8217; feature which bypasses the lengthy upload process, but Google Music offers almost the same amount of cloud storage for free &#8211; Apple has almost a decade-long head start, but Google is putting links into <strong>YouTube</strong> music videos that go directly to the song in their music store. But what&#8217;s important to each user varies, and more importantly it has to do with what kind of device someone owns. Android-based smartphones hold over 50% of the market currently, and what Google really did, is fill the huge mobile music void on the platform&#8230; And when it comes to how all the new subscription music players fit in with the overall discourse, as <strong><a href="http://evolver.fm/2011/11/15/itunes-match-the-past-disguised-as-the-future/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">Evolver.fm</span></a> </strong>points out, they&#8217;re two different animals all together. The <strong>Spotify</strong>&#8217;s, <strong>MOG</strong>&#8217;s, <strong>Rdio</strong>&#8217;s, etc of the world put a plethora of music at your fingertips, but they don&#8217;t allow users to &#8216;own&#8217; their music, which is still a problem for many people. However, they&#8217;re great discovery or sampling tools, because you don&#8217;t have to commit to buying something (or heading to the torrents) before being able to make it accessible across multiple devices. Will something new that is the best of both worlds come along? Time will tell.</p>
<div style='display:none' id="post-refEl-7378"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rm64.com/2011/11/17/digital-round-up-google-music-launches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And then there were 3&#8230; EMI split, where does it lead?</title>
		<link>http://rm64.com/2011/11/15/and-then-there-were-3-emi-split-where-does-it-lead/</link>
		<comments>http://rm64.com/2011/11/15/and-then-there-were-3-emi-split-where-does-it-lead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bertelsmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMG Rights Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMI Music Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMPALA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes Match]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KKR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Faxon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony/ATV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spotify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Music Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vivendi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rm64.com/?p=7369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Universal Music Group and Sony Music continue to dominate the music biz storylines this year with the unpredictable conclusion of the EMI auction, which saw the two industry leaders beating out the long-expected winning bidders in Warner Music and BMG Rights Management.  It might be too soon to call it the era of the &#8216;big three,&#8217; with the regulatory [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-7374" title="big-3" src="http://rm64.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/big-3.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="300" /></p>
<p><strong>Universal Music Group</strong> and <strong>Sony Music</strong> continue to dominate the music biz storylines this year with the unpredictable conclusion of the <strong>EMI</strong> auction, which saw the two industry leaders beating out the long-expected winning bidders in <strong>Warner Music</strong> and <strong>BMG Rights Management</strong>.  It might be too soon to call it the era of the &#8216;big three,&#8217; with the regulatory process expected to last well into 2012 after <strong>Citigroup</strong>&#8217;s auction split EMI into two &#8211; the recorded music going to UMG while <strong>EMI Music Publishing</strong> is set to fall under the ownership of an investment consortium including Sony Music, the estate of <strong>Michael Jackson</strong>, music mogul <strong>David Geffen</strong> and others &#8211; but however you slice it, the trend of contraction continues. And for all the growth and &#8216;turning point&#8217; talk, including from the CEO of UMG parent company <strong>Vivendi</strong>, in the wake of an increase in music sales over last year, the revenue from those sales is still in decline due to the lowering of prices, as pointed out in a <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-11-14/record-sales-rise-as-lady-gaga-adele-find-a-future-with-spotify.html" target="_blank"><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">Bloomberg</span></strong></a> article this week&#8230; So where do things go from here?</p>
<p>Independent music company coalition <strong>IMPALA</strong> began saber rattling prior to the announcement of the EMI auction winners, and were quick to make public their intentions to block the acquisitions by both groups following the announcements on Friday. Industry insiders however are questioning the association&#8217;s ability to ultimately triumph in stopping the completion of either deal. Universal Music is expected to dispose of a certain amount of assets, particularly in European territories where they would now hold a market share well over 50%, and their key argument for approval will be that the music industry is in a much different place even from just a few years ago, and that they like others are at the mercy of technology companies like <strong>Apple</strong> in this new digital age. How well that justification will fare remains to be seen, as there are seemingly plenty of holes. One could easily look to how long it took <strong>Spotify</strong> to launch in the U.S. due to the process of acquiring licenses from the four major label groups, and further, that they negotiated equity stakes in the service in order to allow a launch in America&#8230; It will also be interesting to see how well <strong>Google </strong>does with the launch of a new <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-31001_3-57323505-261/google-music-launching-without-sony-and-warner/?tag=txt;title" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">music store</span></a>, expected to be this week, with only two major labels onboard, Universal and EMI (coincidence?)&#8230; And while <strong>iTunes Match</strong> is expected to succeed, it&#8217;s clear that Apple feels comfortable with their current position and power in the music space, as they continue to expand their sites in new areas of media and content domination&#8230; And as far as the EMI publishing spoils go, many see the creation of the investment entity, of which Sony only holds a minority stake, as making the approval process easier.</p>
<p>Some of the other big questions being asked by observers this week include, what is the fate of EMI Group CEO <strong>Roger Faxon</strong>? A role within Universal Music on the recording side seems unlikely, and while EMI&#8217;s pubco is expected to remain its own entity with <strong>Sony/ATV</strong> in a management and administration role, will there be room for Faxon to reunite with his former EMI publishing co-CEO <strong>Marty Bandier</strong>, and more importantly would he take a reduced-role? How does this play for current Sony Pub players <strong>Jody Gerson</strong> and <strong>Danny Strick</strong>? Will Warner Music be first in line to snatch up EMI recorded assets in European territories from Universal, particularly in light of their recognized weakness abroad and the <a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/record-labels/lyor-cohen-realigns-wmg-senior-management-1005493672.story" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">shake-up</span></a> among its international management structure announced by <strong><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/record-labels/lyor-cohen-realigns-wmg-senior-management-1005493672.story" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">Lyor Cohen</span></a></strong> just last week? Will <strong>Edgar Bronfman Jr.</strong> now exit WMG completely as expected? Contrary to public comments from BMG Rights Management CEO <strong>Hartwig Masuch</strong> today that the EMI publishing purchase was not &#8220;necessary&#8221; for the company, those in the know believe that it was indeed a crucial acquisition for the <strong>KKR</strong> and <strong>Bertelsmann</strong> backed venture, and having failed to secure it, are wondering if KKR will now get out? Insiders share that the Germans are considering buying out KKR’s stake. And having purchased most of the mid-level music publishing business over the last couple years, including <strong>Bug Music</strong> during the EMI auction, will BMG now shift focus to unifying its management structure and operation?</p>
<p>Plenty more action to come&#8230;</p>
<div style='display:none' id="post-refEl-7369"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rm64.com/2011/11/15/and-then-there-were-3-emi-split-where-does-it-lead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Round Up: Dr. Luke Sony Label Deal (Finally) Announced, EMI Auction Drags On &amp; more&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://rm64.com/2011/11/08/round-up-dr-luke-sony-label-finally-announced-emi-auction-drags-on-more/</link>
		<comments>http://rm64.com/2011/11/08/round-up-dr-luke-sony-label-finally-announced-emi-auction-drags-on-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 21:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMG Rights Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Bowie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Die Antwoord]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. Luke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kemosabe Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony/ATV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Music Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warner Music Group]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rm64.com/?p=7337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a New York Times feature on Doug Morris yesterday, included among the expected platitudes from the new CEO of Sony Music, like describing his plan for the company as simply “to help create the pre-eminent record company in the world,&#8221; was the clever and first official disclosure of a new label deal with producer Dr. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_7339" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 187px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-7339           " title="d-luke" src="http://rm64.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/d-luke-500x507.jpg" alt="" width="177" height="180" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Doug Morris&#39; &quot;new Jimmy&quot;</p></div>
<p>In a <strong><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/08/business/media/at-sony-music-a-plan-to-dominate-the-industry.html?_r=1&amp;ref=arts" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">New York Times</span></a></strong> feature on <strong>Doug Morris</strong> yesterday, included among the expected platitudes from the new CEO of <strong>Sony Music</strong>, like describing his plan for the company as simply “to help create the pre-eminent record company in the world,&#8221; was the clever and first official disclosure of a new label deal with producer <strong>Dr. Luke</strong>, which will see the expansion of his current imprint with Sony, <strong>Kemosabe Records</strong>. The news, which we <a href="http://rm64.com/2011/07/07/exclusive-sony-music-in-talks-to-create-label-with-hitmaker-dr-luke/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">exclusively revealed</span></a> back over the summer (with the <strong><a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/pagesix/doctor_orders_at_sony_label_5FOpRwrbCynfcBB1zFwYMP" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">New York Post</span></a></strong> picking up the item shortly after), comes with similar overtones as we initially reported, which is Morris is attempting to recreate his successful investment and development of <strong>Interscope Records </strong>with <strong>Jimmy Iovine</strong> at <strong>Universal Music Group</strong>. The new deal, which has been in negotiation for many months, will put the label on equivalent footing as <strong>Epic</strong>, <strong>Columbia</strong> and <strong>RCA</strong>, and also includes exclusivity at Sony for Dr. Luke&#8217;s producer services for five years &#8211; a component that smacks of Sony&#8217;s soon-to-lapse agreement with <strong>Rick Rubin</strong>, whose production work outside of their label system has been noted by many as part of the arrangements overall failure.  Also central to the Kemosabe deal is the purchase of a significant stake in Dr. Luke&#8217;s publishing by <strong>Sony/ATV</strong>, a move that will give the pubco an interest in what has been Luke&#8217;s highly-successful songwriting operation, which includes a stable of of up-and-coming pop composers with numerous chart-topping credits. Observers are drawing similarities to previous high-dollar publishing investments in hitmakers at their pinnacle, like <strong>Kara Dioguardi</strong>&#8217;s <strong>Arthouse Entertainment</strong> deal&#8230; Meanwhile, <strong>Citigroup</strong>&#8217;s auction of <strong>EMI</strong> is dragging on longer than the bank would like, with plenty of spin and speculation surrounding the action for the recorded music division. Last week saw the twist of <strong>Warner Music Group </strong>owner <strong>Len Blavatnik</strong>,<strong> </strong>pulling his bid from the table after Citi wanted him to increase the offer, though many see it simply as a negotiating tactic from the <strong>Access Industries</strong> owner. In turn, <strong>Universal Music Group</strong>, who previously was thought to be out of the running, is being touted as potentially back in, with the <strong><a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/citi_emi_rekindles_sale_talks_with_upCZpEqwf5Bo0aEHaTpHvI" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">New York Post</span></a></strong> reporting the two sides are scheduled to meet today, though UMG&#8217;s last offer fell below Blavatnik&#8217;s. On the <strong>EMI Music Publishing</strong> side, the deal is still seen as <strong>BMG Rights Management</strong>&#8217;s for the taking&#8230;  Elsewhere, in related news, <strong>David Bowie</strong> is <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/music/music-news/8876174/David-Bowie-may-leave-troubled-EMI.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">reportedly</span></a> on the verge of leaving EMI, which would end a 15-year relationship that gave the label rights to a large part of his catalog of classic albums. Discussions are said to be taking place with both Universal and Sony&#8230; And South African hip-hop enigma <strong>Die Antwoord </strong>are <a href="http://boingboing.net/2011/11/07/dieantwoordleave.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">leaving Interscope Records</span></a>, seemingly as abruptly as they were signed to the label in early 2010. The group, who has a publishing deal with Sony/ATV, will soon be releasing their second album via their own new label <strong>ZEF RECORDZ</strong>.</p>
<div style='display:none' id="post-refEl-7337"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rm64.com/2011/11/08/round-up-dr-luke-sony-label-finally-announced-emi-auction-drags-on-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Round Up: New Music Economy, Steve Jobs Bio Reveals iTunes Dealings &amp; more&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://rm64.com/2011/10/27/digital-round-up-new-music-economy-steve-jobs-bio-reveals-itunes-dealings-more/</link>
		<comments>http://rm64.com/2011/10/27/digital-round-up-new-music-economy-steve-jobs-bio-reveals-itunes-dealings-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coldplay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spotify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tunecore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rm64.com/?p=7261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An article on Rollingstone.com has been getting passed around this week, as magazine contributor and author of music biz treatise, Appetite for Self-Destruction, Steve Knopper, took a stab at outlining the &#8220;new economy&#8221; of music sales. Streaming-music services in particular are a hot topic recently among artists, record labels, music-tech start ups and those who observe [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_7266" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 183px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-7266   " title="nickels" src="http://rm64.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/nickels-500x333.jpg" alt="" width="173" height="115" /><p class="wp-caption-text">swimming upstream</p></div>
<p>An article on <strong><span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/the-new-economics-of-the-music-industry-20111025" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">Rollingstone.com</span></a> </span></strong>has been getting passed around this week, as magazine contributor and author of music biz treatise, <em>Appetite for Self-Destruction</em>, <strong>Steve Knopper</strong>, took a stab at outlining the &#8220;new economy&#8221; of music sales. Streaming-music services in particular are a hot topic recently among artists, record labels, music-tech start ups and those who observe and comment on all of their goings-on. Among the choice quotes from the piece includes one from <strong>Jeff Price</strong>, founder of <strong>TuneCore</strong>, who commented on the confusing nature of streaming royalty rates, saying &#8220;It is beyond complicated. It took me literally three months to understand this thing,&#8221; while <strong>MOG</strong> founder <strong>David Hyman</strong> chimed in on the record labels distribution of streaming royalties to artists, &#8220;Once they get that wad of money, how do they distribute it internally? I have no idea&#8221;&#8230; The biography of <strong>Steve Jobs </strong>and its contents has been another widely discussed subject recently, with various story lines that cross into the music industry sector as well, including the Jobs experiences dealing with major labels. A <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/jobs_to_sony_ipod_grab_no_way_lack_2vjtgncySOg9FneqfanLmJ" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>New York Post</strong></span></a> item today points to <strong>Apple</strong>&#8217;s iTunes negotiation with former <strong>Sony Music</strong> boss <strong>Andy Lack</strong>, as particularly difficult, with Lack asking for royalties on each iPod sold, and Jobs criticizing him for not understanding his own business. Meanwhile, other more obvious iTunes related revelations are made, such as the reason that <strong>The Beatles</strong> only recently appeared in the digital marketplace was due to ongoing and unresolved contractual issues between the group and <strong>EMI</strong>&#8230; Elsewhere, <strong><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/digital-and-mobile/twitter-hires-tatiana-simonian-to-specialize-1005438402.story" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">Twitter</span></a></strong> has made its first specialized music hiring, in former <strong>Disney Music Group</strong> marketing manager <strong>Tatiana Simonian</strong>&#8230; <strong>AOL</strong> SVP of business development <strong>Jared Grusd</strong> is <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20111027/aols-biz-dev-svp-and-strategy-chief-heads-to-spotify/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">reportedly</span></a> heading to <strong>Spotify</strong>&#8230; In a surprising move, <strong><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-31001_3-20125886-261/coldplay-latest-act-to-freeze-out-streaming-services-scoop/?tag=txt;title" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">Coldplay</span></a></strong> has opted to not make their new album <em>Mylo Xyloto </em>(pronounced &#8220;@&amp;*%^$&#8221;) available on streaming services like Spotify, <strong>Rdio</strong>, MOG, <strong>Rhapsody</strong> and others, in what could be seen as a stance similar to holdout artists whose material still isn&#8217;t available on iTunes and other digital retailers&#8230; And more clues about <strong>Google</strong>&#8217;s upcoming launch of a music store comes this week with <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/10/26/possible-signs-of-google-music-store-found-in-android-market/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">evidence</span></a> of an expanded <strong>Android</strong> mobile landing page for the new Google Music service.</p>
<div style='display:none' id="post-refEl-7261"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rm64.com/2011/10/27/digital-round-up-new-music-economy-steve-jobs-bio-reveals-itunes-dealings-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

